<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jughead Many Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/01/jughead-many-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/01/jughead-many-thoughts/</link>
	<description>A place to write and read Lost Theories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wigster</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/01/jughead-many-thoughts/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Wigster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=220#comment-697</guid>
		<description>loved the chernobyl/swan link, that was great. I also thought if one english man turned out to be old widders, why not one very well spoken english lady being old hawkers. It&#039;s the accent which done it for me.

So I guess alpert never travelled back in time at all, he waited 2 years and went to that hopsital.  Great stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>loved the chernobyl/swan link, that was great. I also thought if one english man turned out to be old widders, why not one very well spoken english lady being old hawkers. It&#8217;s the accent which done it for me.</p>
<p>So I guess alpert never travelled back in time at all, he waited 2 years and went to that hopsital.  Great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emzi</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/01/jughead-many-thoughts/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>emzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=220#comment-687</guid>
		<description>I really like the idea that Ellie is Ms. Hawking! I never even thought about it but it does make complete sense, especially as Daniel told her she looks familiar! 

Great stuff! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the idea that Ellie is Ms. Hawking! I never even thought about it but it does make complete sense, especially as Daniel told her she looks familiar! </p>
<p>Great stuff! <img src='http://www.theoriesonlost.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimberly</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/01/jughead-many-thoughts/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>kimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=220#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Lets remember who Richard saw...Locke, Miles, Charlotte and Daniel. Right? He didn&#039;t see Juliet, because she ended up going to Daniel, Sawyer and Ellie. Was that her way of making sure that her and Richard didn&#039;t meet since they weren&#039;t supposed to meet until approximately 2001? 

I also was thinking about how there&#039;s the possibility that many of the other Others from last night&#039;s episode may in fact have followed Widmore instead of Richard eventually, so we can&#039;t be certain that many of the 1954 Others are the same Others when Juliet is around, let alone Sawyer or Locke. 

Especially if they had some reproduction issues....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets remember who Richard saw&#8230;Locke, Miles, Charlotte and Daniel. Right? He didn&#8217;t see Juliet, because she ended up going to Daniel, Sawyer and Ellie. Was that her way of making sure that her and Richard didn&#8217;t meet since they weren&#8217;t supposed to meet until approximately 2001? </p>
<p>I also was thinking about how there&#8217;s the possibility that many of the other Others from last night&#8217;s episode may in fact have followed Widmore instead of Richard eventually, so we can&#8217;t be certain that many of the 1954 Others are the same Others when Juliet is around, let alone Sawyer or Locke. </p>
<p>Especially if they had some reproduction issues&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dabiatchishere</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/01/jughead-many-thoughts/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>dabiatchishere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=220#comment-579</guid>
		<description>shanimal, I love the post!  I like how they made the viewers aware of why Richard was convinced he had found &#039;the island&#039;s&#039; next leader in Locke.

The other question it raised for me, is why Alpert and &#039;the others&#039; apparently don&#039;t recognize some of &#039;the losties&#039; when they meet up again in the future.  Or did they?? hmmm!

&#039;Jughead&#039;, is a common reference to bombs. The name &#039;Jughead&#039; appears on the side of the bomb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shanimal, I love the post!  I like how they made the viewers aware of why Richard was convinced he had found &#8216;the island&#8217;s&#8217; next leader in Locke.</p>
<p>The other question it raised for me, is why Alpert and &#8216;the others&#8217; apparently don&#8217;t recognize some of &#8216;the losties&#8217; when they meet up again in the future.  Or did they?? hmmm!</p>
<p>&#8216;Jughead&#8217;, is a common reference to bombs. The name &#8216;Jughead&#8217; appears on the side of the bomb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre7</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/01/jughead-many-thoughts/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=220#comment-578</guid>
		<description>Since season one it has amused me to think of how the writers got themselves in a pickle.

They create a show about a crash on a deserted island. As they write a half dozen episodes a pattern begins to emerge. Each episodes covers a period of one to three days in terms of story time. They (as producers) realize that this show is going to be a continuity nightmare. Anyone who has watched the bonus features of Season 4 - the documentary on the guns has had a laugh about that.

Aside from the progressively deteriorating state of castaway clothing, beards, hair length, etc. are an issue. You can see them working out these problems (not always satisfactorily) through the first two seasons.

Then I imagine some timid voice around the writer&#039;s table squeaks &#039;What are we going to do about the kid?&#039;

Obviously, with the success of the series it became painful for them to have written a Michael-Walt story into the show. Their conscience probably did not allow them to kill off Walt. Sending him off in season two probably got them off the hook (at least for awhile).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since season one it has amused me to think of how the writers got themselves in a pickle.</p>
<p>They create a show about a crash on a deserted island. As they write a half dozen episodes a pattern begins to emerge. Each episodes covers a period of one to three days in terms of story time. They (as producers) realize that this show is going to be a continuity nightmare. Anyone who has watched the bonus features of Season 4 &#8211; the documentary on the guns has had a laugh about that.</p>
<p>Aside from the progressively deteriorating state of castaway clothing, beards, hair length, etc. are an issue. You can see them working out these problems (not always satisfactorily) through the first two seasons.</p>
<p>Then I imagine some timid voice around the writer&#8217;s table squeaks &#8216;What are we going to do about the kid?&#8217;</p>
<p>Obviously, with the success of the series it became painful for them to have written a Michael-Walt story into the show. Their conscience probably did not allow them to kill off Walt. Sending him off in season two probably got them off the hook (at least for awhile).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acharaisthekey</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/01/jughead-many-thoughts/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>acharaisthekey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=220#comment-576</guid>
		<description>1.  I think Jughead is simply THE SICKNESS.  If you think about it, Daniel realized you had to bury it because of the leaking WHITE THING.  I&#039;m guessing this Radiation would make you sick in the form he saw it.  I like your idea though....it makes sense!

2.  Right on with Richard!

3.  YOU ARE RIGHT!!!  Ellie for sure is Mrs. Hawking! (and probably though against my prediction, Faraday&#039;s mom)

4.  The Commercial was for TYSON CHICKEN NUGGETS!! Poor guy!  Definately needs a new agent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  I think Jughead is simply THE SICKNESS.  If you think about it, Daniel realized you had to bury it because of the leaking WHITE THING.  I&#8217;m guessing this Radiation would make you sick in the form he saw it.  I like your idea though&#8230;.it makes sense!</p>
<p>2.  Right on with Richard!</p>
<p>3.  YOU ARE RIGHT!!!  Ellie for sure is Mrs. Hawking! (and probably though against my prediction, Faraday&#8217;s mom)</p>
<p>4.  The Commercial was for TYSON CHICKEN NUGGETS!! Poor guy!  Definately needs a new agent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.E.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/01/jughead-many-thoughts/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>A.E.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=220#comment-566</guid>
		<description>loved the stuff about alpert, have been saying forr a week now that mama faraday is hawking 2/2 now...but as for walt, well i think a growing boy sometimes grows a little too fast..nice post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>loved the stuff about alpert, have been saying forr a week now that mama faraday is hawking 2/2 now&#8230;but as for walt, well i think a growing boy sometimes grows a little too fast..nice post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

