<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radzinsky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/03/radzinsky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/03/radzinsky/</link>
	<description>A place to write and read Lost Theories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.E.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/03/radzinsky/#comment-6880</link>
		<dc:creator>A.E.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=1978#comment-6880</guid>
		<description>Minkowski...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minkowski&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chief</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/03/radzinsky/#comment-6877</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=1978#comment-6877</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t the communications officer on the boat (the one that Charles Widmore sent) called Rdzinsky?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t the communications officer on the boat (the one that Charles Widmore sent) called Rdzinsky?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.E.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/03/radzinsky/#comment-6760</link>
		<dc:creator>A.E.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=1978#comment-6760</guid>
		<description>Sharper than Gillette...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharper than Gillette&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas5</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/03/radzinsky/#comment-6748</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=1978#comment-6748</guid>
		<description>AES, thats a great point. You&#039;ve heard of Occams Razor, often the most straight forward explanation IS the correct explanation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AES, thats a great point. You&#8217;ve heard of Occams Razor, often the most straight forward explanation IS the correct explanation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.E.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/03/radzinsky/#comment-6729</link>
		<dc:creator>A.E.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=1978#comment-6729</guid>
		<description>Does nobody believe Radzinsky is Radzinsky?

Lol, I swear Im not making light of your theory at all Henry, I just have to ask. Your obviously not the only one who thinks Radzinsky that kills himself is not the Radzinski we all know.
I cant help but giggle a little.
If the writers are going to keep him the same character and nobody kill or pose as him, they have to giggle at this a little as well.
I just think with all the who&#039;s this, and who&#039;s that, it is a little too comlicated to believe that someone else ends up being him. The actor is new, he is obviously unstable...Radzinsky, not the actor.
He is paranoid, and crazy about the swan. It would make perfect sense for Radzinsky himself to be the one to go into his beloved Swan.
Or even the fact that he is such a threat to the Losties could be enough for ..Lafleur(..I still dont like saying that..) to make him be the one that goes into the Swan, to protect himself and the losties from the future.
I am having enough trouble figuring out who Jacob, Annie, Des&#039;s baby, the rest of the kids, and Ray actually are, or how they are important, to try to figure out who someone who has already been introduced actually ends up being.
I think sometimes the obvious on Lost seems too easy, and this may be one of those times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does nobody believe Radzinsky is Radzinsky?</p>
<p>Lol, I swear Im not making light of your theory at all Henry, I just have to ask. Your obviously not the only one who thinks Radzinsky that kills himself is not the Radzinski we all know.<br />
I cant help but giggle a little.<br />
If the writers are going to keep him the same character and nobody kill or pose as him, they have to giggle at this a little as well.<br />
I just think with all the who&#8217;s this, and who&#8217;s that, it is a little too comlicated to believe that someone else ends up being him. The actor is new, he is obviously unstable&#8230;Radzinsky, not the actor.<br />
He is paranoid, and crazy about the swan. It would make perfect sense for Radzinsky himself to be the one to go into his beloved Swan.<br />
Or even the fact that he is such a threat to the Losties could be enough for ..Lafleur(..I still dont like saying that..) to make him be the one that goes into the Swan, to protect himself and the losties from the future.<br />
I am having enough trouble figuring out who Jacob, Annie, Des&#8217;s baby, the rest of the kids, and Ray actually are, or how they are important, to try to figure out who someone who has already been introduced actually ends up being.<br />
I think sometimes the obvious on Lost seems too easy, and this may be one of those times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: username</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/03/radzinsky/#comment-6723</link>
		<dc:creator>username</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=1978#comment-6723</guid>
		<description>yes, however, we could assume the covered maybe 2 or 3 days in the last episode, it&#039;s hard to tell really.  next week will be another slow one where ben gets fixed, than after that it may push ahead a few months for the swan to be built to allow them to cause the incident by the end of the season</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, however, we could assume the covered maybe 2 or 3 days in the last episode, it&#8217;s hard to tell really.  next week will be another slow one where ben gets fixed, than after that it may push ahead a few months for the swan to be built to allow them to cause the incident by the end of the season</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cappayne</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/03/radzinsky/#comment-6721</link>
		<dc:creator>cappayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 06:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=1978#comment-6721</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say time will elapse really fast to the major points.  Since two episodes ago Jack etc. got back, only 1 day elapsed over this episode.  I&#039;d like to think that the next couple of episodes cover at least a couple of months each.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say time will elapse really fast to the major points.  Since two episodes ago Jack etc. got back, only 1 day elapsed over this episode.  I&#8217;d like to think that the next couple of episodes cover at least a couple of months each.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henrygale108</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/03/radzinsky/#comment-6716</link>
		<dc:creator>henrygale108</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=1978#comment-6716</guid>
		<description>so are we gonna see another time flash or is the show just going to skip ahead to the incident</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so are we gonna see another time flash or is the show just going to skip ahead to the incident</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimberly</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/03/radzinsky/#comment-6706</link>
		<dc:creator>kimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=1978#comment-6706</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s late and I&#039;m tired...but I just have to ask...at what point does the &#039;mandatory&#039; suit thing come into play? Because that would make for an easy &#039;disguise&#039;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s late and I&#8217;m tired&#8230;but I just have to ask&#8230;at what point does the &#8216;mandatory&#8217; suit thing come into play? Because that would make for an easy &#8216;disguise&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lost4815162342</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/03/radzinsky/#comment-6705</link>
		<dc:creator>lost4815162342</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=1978#comment-6705</guid>
		<description>Radzinsky, or the person pretending to be him, will shoot himself after 1991.  Since the Swan people will be shut off from the rest of the world, maybe Faraday can pretend to be him. If we&#039;re guessing on who will die among our major players, I say Sayid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radzinsky, or the person pretending to be him, will shoot himself after 1991.  Since the Swan people will be shut off from the rest of the world, maybe Faraday can pretend to be him. If we&#8217;re guessing on who will die among our major players, I say Sayid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

