<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jhon 3:16 part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/05/jhon-316-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/05/jhon-316-part-2/</link>
	<description>A place to write and read Lost Theories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nilladh</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/05/jhon-316-part-2/#comment-17226</link>
		<dc:creator>nilladh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 04:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=5518#comment-17226</guid>
		<description>argh this was supposed to be in regular theories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>argh this was supposed to be in regular theories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dabiatchishere</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/05/jhon-316-part-2/#comment-17112</link>
		<dc:creator>dabiatchishere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=5518#comment-17112</guid>
		<description>nilladh, I have never forgotten the words of Locke&#039;s mother, telling John he was an &#039;immaculate conception&#039;.  I felt there was something to that statement.

It certainly ties-in with the thoughts that John Locke may be the individual;  &#039;who shall save us all&#039;, from &#039;what lies in the shadow of the statue&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nilladh, I have never forgotten the words of Locke&#8217;s mother, telling John he was an &#8216;immaculate conception&#8217;.  I felt there was something to that statement.</p>
<p>It certainly ties-in with the thoughts that John Locke may be the individual;  &#8216;who shall save us all&#8217;, from &#8216;what lies in the shadow of the statue&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

