Comments on: Interesting idea http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/12/interesting-idea/ A place to write and read Lost Theories Thu, 17 May 2012 19:43:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: I_Am_Jacob http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/12/interesting-idea/#comment-21386 I_Am_Jacob Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:51:37 +0000 http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=7474#comment-21386 the only thing that i may argue against this theory with is with regards to the bunnys. I believe in a online video extra of Lost we see Dr Chang talking to the camera with a bunny behind him and then all of a sudden a bunny with the same number on it's side appears (from the past or future). this causes Chang to go into a bit of a panic saying somthing like the 2 bunnys can't go near oneanother for whatever reason. If this is the case then the two Jacks probably wouldnt be able to go near each other either? the only thing that i may argue against this theory with is with regards to the bunnys. I believe in a online video extra of Lost we see Dr Chang talking to the camera with a bunny behind him and then all of a sudden a bunny with the same number on it’s side appears (from the past or future). this causes Chang to go into a bit of a panic saying somthing like the 2 bunnys can’t go near oneanother for whatever reason. If this is the case then the two Jacks probably wouldnt be able to go near each other either?

]]> By: BanLinus http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/12/interesting-idea/#comment-21246 BanLinus Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:29:12 +0000 http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=7474#comment-21246 Also what you describe is not an alternate time line. I don't even know what it is. Unless Jack from 1977 survives and HE is the second Jack that you refer to. Also what you describe is not an alternate time line. I don’t even know what it is. Unless Jack from 1977 survives and HE is the second Jack that you refer to.

]]> By: BanLinus http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/12/interesting-idea/#comment-21245 BanLinus Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:27:56 +0000 http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=7474#comment-21245 Well I haven't read any spoilers so I"m hoping this person didn't reveal anything from actual footage of season six. I mean we can't avoid the comicon stuff and cast news. But if you are revealing something that is from a spoiler site about the actual scripts, then please don't. Otherwise you have a few facts wrong and it seems a little too silly for this show. If an adjacent time line begins in 1977, then there are many possible ramifications. Including the possibility that any of our characters conceived after 1977 may not even be born. Well I haven’t read any spoilers so I”m hoping this person didn’t reveal anything from actual footage of season six. I mean we can’t avoid the comicon stuff and cast news. But if you are revealing something that is from a spoiler site about the actual scripts, then please don’t.

Otherwise you have a few facts wrong and it seems a little too silly for this show.

If an adjacent time line begins in 1977, then there are many possible ramifications. Including the possibility that any of our characters conceived after 1977 may not even be born.

]]> By: surago636 http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/12/interesting-idea/#comment-21241 surago636 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:12:21 +0000 http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=7474#comment-21241 Doesn't every theory? Doesn’t every theory?

]]> By: ilieintheshadowofthestatue http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2009/12/interesting-idea/#comment-21240 ilieintheshadowofthestatue Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:59:58 +0000 http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=7474#comment-21240 I think this theory should be removed as it contains possible spoilers. I think this theory should be removed as it contains possible spoilers.

]]>