Comments on: Charles Widmore never played by the rules… http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/02/charles-widmore-never-played-by-the-rules/ A place to write and read Lost Theories Thu, 17 May 2012 19:43:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Sinster http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/02/charles-widmore-never-played-by-the-rules/#comment-27530 Sinster Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:29:10 +0000 http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=10114#comment-27530 I can't wait to see what the repercussions are for breaking rules... I can’t wait to see what the repercussions are for breaking rules…

]]> By: LOST-in translation http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/02/charles-widmore-never-played-by-the-rules/#comment-27529 LOST-in translation Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:26:04 +0000 http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=10114#comment-27529 There may be some truth to the theory that there is a rule against killing a "candidate". Could it be possible that's what the blonde kid was referring to when he told UnLocke "You know the rules. You can't kill him". Maybe he means you can't kill Sawyer because he's a candidate. Maybe that's why Sawyer can see the kid...because he's still a candidate. There may be some truth to the theory that there is a rule against killing a “candidate”. Could it be possible that’s what the blonde kid was referring to when he told UnLocke “You know the rules. You can’t kill him”. Maybe he means you can’t kill Sawyer because he’s a candidate. Maybe that’s why Sawyer can see the kid…because he’s still a candidate.

]]> By: waycurious http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/02/charles-widmore-never-played-by-the-rules/#comment-27500 waycurious Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:01:18 +0000 http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=10114#comment-27500 Leaders all from off island, so likely Jacob replacemnts, too - so not Alex. MIB coulda' let Sawyer die on the ropes. He didn't. (Prob. so he could manipulate the 'New Jacob' into letting him go home.) Leaders all from off island, so likely Jacob replacemnts, too – so not Alex.

MIB coulda’ let Sawyer die on the ropes. He didn’t. (Prob. so he could manipulate the ‘New Jacob’ into letting him go home.)

]]> By: foreverpuzzled http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/02/charles-widmore-never-played-by-the-rules/#comment-27491 foreverpuzzled Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:30:54 +0000 http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=10114#comment-27491 i don't think that its that the candidates can't be killed exactly but probably not killed directly by the hand of Jacob and MIB. Just like MIB could not kill Jacob with his hands but could thru minipulating Ben to do so. i don’t think that its that the candidates can’t be killed exactly but probably not killed directly by the hand of Jacob and MIB. Just like MIB could not kill Jacob with his hands but could thru minipulating Ben to do so.

]]> By: Sinster http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/02/charles-widmore-never-played-by-the-rules/#comment-27415 Sinster Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:41:44 +0000 http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=10114#comment-27415 Yes, but we have 2 figure Ben may have not even know about the candidates bc he knew very little about Jacob... I double checked Lostpedia, and Charles also wanted Ben to kill Danielle... So he definitely sent him to kill a candidate. Yes, but we have 2 figure Ben may have not even know about the candidates bc he knew very little about Jacob…

I double checked Lostpedia, and Charles also wanted Ben to kill Danielle… So he definitely sent him to kill a candidate.

]]> By: lostangela http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/02/charles-widmore-never-played-by-the-rules/#comment-27414 lostangela Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:39:28 +0000 http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=10114#comment-27414 Locke was a candidate, and he was killed. We are seeing some paralells with Claire/Aaron & Rouseau/Alex though... Locke was a candidate, and he was killed. We are seeing some paralells with Claire/Aaron & Rouseau/Alex though…

]]>