<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe&#8217;s Weekly LOST Thingy. (Happy St Paddy&#8217;s Day)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/03/joes-weekly-lost-thingy-happy-st-paddys-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/03/joes-weekly-lost-thingy-happy-st-paddys-day/</link>
	<description>A place to write and read Lost Theories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odette</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/03/joes-weekly-lost-thingy-happy-st-paddys-day/#comment-29826</link>
		<dc:creator>Odette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=11163#comment-29826</guid>
		<description>Thank you :)... I also like Juliet and Sawyer together and get very bothered by Terry O&#039;Quinn&#039;s man-boobs!  Love ya!  

BTW, on the theory aspect of your post, I agree with the mirror quality of their lives in the different realities.  I am thinking that only the people that end up on the right side of the battle on the island have their lives positively affected in the parallel life (i.e. Hurley being lucky, Jack not drinking and understanding his Daddy issues--they are still candidates;  Locke still in a wheelchair and unhappy, Sayid still killing and without his love and unhappy--they have gone to the dark-side)  Makes me wonder about Claire&#039;s story--will Aaron be OK in the parallel life since she is on the wrong side on the island?  And Sawyer and Kate are walking the line and their stories are not totally positive or negative yet.  What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you <img src='http://www.theoriesonlost.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8230; I also like Juliet and Sawyer together and get very bothered by Terry O&#8217;Quinn&#8217;s man-boobs!  Love ya!  </p>
<p>BTW, on the theory aspect of your post, I agree with the mirror quality of their lives in the different realities.  I am thinking that only the people that end up on the right side of the battle on the island have their lives positively affected in the parallel life (i.e. Hurley being lucky, Jack not drinking and understanding his Daddy issues&#8211;they are still candidates;  Locke still in a wheelchair and unhappy, Sayid still killing and without his love and unhappy&#8211;they have gone to the dark-side)  Makes me wonder about Claire&#8217;s story&#8211;will Aaron be OK in the parallel life since she is on the wrong side on the island?  And Sawyer and Kate are walking the line and their stories are not totally positive or negative yet.  What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m0nini873</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/03/joes-weekly-lost-thingy-happy-st-paddys-day/#comment-29787</link>
		<dc:creator>m0nini873</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=11163#comment-29787</guid>
		<description>Oops...I meant MiB though..NOT Jacob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops&#8230;I meant MiB though..NOT Jacob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m0nini873</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/03/joes-weekly-lost-thingy-happy-st-paddys-day/#comment-29785</link>
		<dc:creator>m0nini873</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=11163#comment-29785</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think your contradictory theory is that radical..after all a &quot;psychic&quot; did kind of hint that the baby (Aaron) would be evil/doomed if CLAIRE herself did not raise the baby.  Kate was portrayed as a good mother off the island, but really, she&#039;s a con/fugitive, so how good of an influence can she be on Aaron?  Now that Claire has missed the first three years of his life, let&#039;s see how messed up Aaron gets.  Additionally, UnLocke was speaking about mothers and mentioned to Kate that Claire was a crazy mother and he himself had one (geez, does everyone have parental issues on this show?).  At this point, I was thinking what you wrote in your theory more or less.  But the only thing that held me back about it was that you would think UnLocke would be more ...emotional/less stoic ...about talking about his own mom if he were indeed Aaron...
Yes, I&#039;ve noticed UnLocke&#039;s manboobs, but he&#039;s a good actor...so whatever.  Kate could use the donation from him though. lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think your contradictory theory is that radical..after all a &#8220;psychic&#8221; did kind of hint that the baby (Aaron) would be evil/doomed if CLAIRE herself did not raise the baby.  Kate was portrayed as a good mother off the island, but really, she&#8217;s a con/fugitive, so how good of an influence can she be on Aaron?  Now that Claire has missed the first three years of his life, let&#8217;s see how messed up Aaron gets.  Additionally, UnLocke was speaking about mothers and mentioned to Kate that Claire was a crazy mother and he himself had one (geez, does everyone have parental issues on this show?).  At this point, I was thinking what you wrote in your theory more or less.  But the only thing that held me back about it was that you would think UnLocke would be more &#8230;emotional/less stoic &#8230;about talking about his own mom if he were indeed Aaron&#8230;<br />
Yes, I&#8217;ve noticed UnLocke&#8217;s manboobs, but he&#8217;s a good actor&#8230;so whatever.  Kate could use the donation from him though. lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilieintheshadowofthestatue</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/03/joes-weekly-lost-thingy-happy-st-paddys-day/#comment-29662</link>
		<dc:creator>ilieintheshadowofthestatue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=11163#comment-29662</guid>
		<description>What do you mean impersonation? Locke is just Locke!

Kidding... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean impersonation? Locke is just Locke!</p>
<p>Kidding&#8230; <img src='http://www.theoriesonlost.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waycurious</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/03/joes-weekly-lost-thingy-happy-st-paddys-day/#comment-29661</link>
		<dc:creator>waycurious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=11163#comment-29661</guid>
		<description>Sure - tempt us w/your protected tweets. How do ya&#039; even know it&#039;s us ... maybe it&#039;s Smokie impersonating us ... ever think of that!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure &#8211; tempt us w/your protected tweets. How do ya&#8217; even know it&#8217;s us &#8230; maybe it&#8217;s Smokie impersonating us &#8230; ever think of that!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waycurious</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/03/joes-weekly-lost-thingy-happy-st-paddys-day/#comment-29653</link>
		<dc:creator>waycurious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=11163#comment-29653</guid>
		<description>Hubby wonderin&#039; why Kate had backpack in a way that pushed up her boobs ... until we saw Locke wearing the same shirt.   We&#039;re sure that&#039;s what they were talkin&#039; about in there one-on-one.  (Not to be confused w/Sawyer&#039;s one-on-one.)

BTW:  You missed how Miles seems a little stalkerish/jealous in his &quot;I ran your credit cards and you are SO busted.   *sniff* It&#039;s bad enough you ran off to Australia ... but, now you&#039;re keeping secrets from me!  *sniff sniff*  I&#039;m not sure I want to be your &#039;partner&#039; any more!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hubby wonderin&#8217; why Kate had backpack in a way that pushed up her boobs &#8230; until we saw Locke wearing the same shirt.   We&#8217;re sure that&#8217;s what they were talkin&#8217; about in there one-on-one.  (Not to be confused w/Sawyer&#8217;s one-on-one.)</p>
<p>BTW:  You missed how Miles seems a little stalkerish/jealous in his &#8220;I ran your credit cards and you are SO busted.   *sniff* It&#8217;s bad enough you ran off to Australia &#8230; but, now you&#8217;re keeping secrets from me!  *sniff sniff*  I&#8217;m not sure I want to be your &#8216;partner&#8217; any more!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chiefof16</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/03/joes-weekly-lost-thingy-happy-st-paddys-day/#comment-29651</link>
		<dc:creator>Chiefof16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=11163#comment-29651</guid>
		<description>&quot;Claire got off easy&quot; - yes she did. No diaper changing whatsoever.

I love your reasoning behind Shmlocke telling Sawyer he&#039;s the smoke monster - To prevent any name calling regarding his milkmakers. LMAO.

&quot;God&#039;s got nothing to do with it&quot; - I believe that&#039;s a hint to us that &quot;God&quot; has nothing to do with it, but &quot;Evil Incarnate&quot; does. We can easily write off religion in this show, but there are too many religious references to really look away from them. I think Dogen was right, we shouldn&#039;t trust &quot;Shmflocke&quot; in any way, shape, or form, no pun intended.

About Juliet, sorry, I hope she stays out of this show for the remaining duration. I never liked her, or her lies.

Again, another fun post to read. Thanks man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Claire got off easy&#8221; &#8211; yes she did. No diaper changing whatsoever.</p>
<p>I love your reasoning behind Shmlocke telling Sawyer he&#8217;s the smoke monster &#8211; To prevent any name calling regarding his milkmakers. LMAO.</p>
<p>&#8220;God&#8217;s got nothing to do with it&#8221; &#8211; I believe that&#8217;s a hint to us that &#8220;God&#8221; has nothing to do with it, but &#8220;Evil Incarnate&#8221; does. We can easily write off religion in this show, but there are too many religious references to really look away from them. I think Dogen was right, we shouldn&#8217;t trust &#8220;Shmflocke&#8221; in any way, shape, or form, no pun intended.</p>
<p>About Juliet, sorry, I hope she stays out of this show for the remaining duration. I never liked her, or her lies.</p>
<p>Again, another fun post to read. Thanks man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeadPakistaniOnYourCouch</title>
		<link>http://www.theoriesonlost.com/2010/03/joes-weekly-lost-thingy-happy-st-paddys-day/#comment-29641</link>
		<dc:creator>DeadPakistaniOnYourCouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoriesonlost.com/?p=11163#comment-29641</guid>
		<description>Good read, can&#039;t wait for Richard&#039;s story!
Any thoughts on his origins? Maybe he was on the black rock when jacob gave him the power to stop aging</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read, can&#8217;t wait for Richard&#8217;s story!<br />
Any thoughts on his origins? Maybe he was on the black rock when jacob gave him the power to stop aging</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

