Comments on: There’s no other explanation.

By: helentink

helentink — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:54:28 +0000

i really hope it’s not aliens. or a dream sequence.or like that film identity where they’re all in someone’s (hurley’s) head.

By: AmILost

AmILost — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:58:11 +0000

Foreverpuzzled, this is probably what you were thinking of from Star Trek as said by Spock, “Once you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

By: foreverpuzzled

foreverpuzzled — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:31:52 +0000

I actually thought I had borrowed that one from Star Trek.Either way thought it seemed appropriate.

By: I_Am_Jacob

I_Am_Jacob — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:52:35 +0000

foreverpuzzled, a very clever reference to Sherlock Holmes but very very true. Nice.

Maybe we need to start thinking more illogically.

By: highbrow

highbrow — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000

It’s cool to write a theory and to find that you were right about something but I don’t think that’s really why we post theories here… is it? We’re never going to actually predict anything about the show accurately because really, it’s just fiction. The whole universe in which the story takes place is made up and therefore different from reality. We can’t predict anything there. I thought we came up with ideas, theories, whatnot for fun. We can pose something and argue about it, trying to fit it into the little we actually know about the show and what we know about the universe that we live in but really, anything can happen. The producers/writers have created their own universe and whatever they say, goes.

By: ekolocation

ekolocation — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:15:29 +0000

usually the more elaborate the theory, the more it relies on assumption and is based on things there are no evidence of. the more elaborate one gets, the less likely their theory will come to fruition, because while the writer’s theory is no doubt elaborate, they are working backwards in relation to us.

so no doubt the elaborate theorists will be wrong all the time.

By: ilieintheshadowofthestatue

ilieintheshadowofthestatue — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:09:56 +0000

ekolocation, when I said the smartest theorists, I meant the ones who have presented the most elaborate theories, deviating significantly from the most obvious interpretation of what we have actually been shown on Lost. It’s always intriguing reading, but probably not very close to how Lost will actually play out.

By: ekolocation

ekolocation — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:28:23 +0000

@ilie. i thought that mib=flocke=smokey. i am a mensa member.

By: foreverpuzzled

foreverpuzzled — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:41:00 +0000

If I had to guess how its gonna end I would say that they’ve been thinking outside the box all along. I would’nt be surprised if they are creating a new story unlike the ideas people have had about them retelling a old story new.Whatever the explainations are I’m sure they’ll cover all their bases to make the story line fit.Can’t wait to see how it all ends!

By: foreverpuzzled

foreverpuzzled — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:03:53 +0000

Once you have disproved all logical possibilties, possibilities you have left no matter how illogical have to be considered.